THE 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS
Robot consciousness: theoretical and empirical issues
Antonio Chella, Riccardo Manzotti
Objective. Robot consciousness is an emerging field that addresses the problems of designing and implementing computational models of consciousness in a robot. The target of robot consciousness research is twofold: the possibility of building conscious robots (i.e., facing the hard problem of qualia) and the analysis of the active role of consciousness in controlling and planning the behavior of a robot. Robot consciousness is placed at the crossing between technical disciplines (AI, robotics, computer science and engineering), theoretical disciplines (philosophy of mind, linguistics, logic), and empirical disciplines (psychology and neuroscience). It focuses on attempts to apply the methods of AI, robotics and computer science to understand consciousness and to examine the possible role of consciousness in Robotics. On the one hand there is the hope that facing the problem of consciousness would be a decisive move to design really autonomous robots, on the other hand the implementations of robotic models of consciousness could be helpful for understanding natural consciousness.
Outline.The tutorial will present the current state of research in robot consciousness and it will discuss the theoretical foundations and the experimental results of the field and their importance for the IAS community.
The tutorial will be divided in four parts:
Background. In the last few years, the once “incongruous” idea of machine consciousness gained increasing momentum . This upsurge of interest in a such a technological possibility has been encouraged by the parallel increase in consciousness-related research in the field of neuroscience. Are these studies of any relevance in the field of robotics, artificial intelligence, and computer vision? Artificial consciousness, sometimes labeled as machine consciousness, is the attempt to model and implement those aspects of human cognition that are identified with the often elusive and controversial phenomenon of consciousness. In brief, the tutorial will outline the complete theoretical framework in which current consciousness related scientific research is carried on. The tutorial will also list the most promising models (Global Work Space, Tononi’s information integration, Embodied Cognition, Externalist approaches to conscious experience, Seth’s model) contrasting advantages and shortcomings. .
Questions to be discussed include: What advantage does
consciousness provide to biological agents? Why does the brain produce a
conscious representation of cognitive processing? What are the physical
underpinnings of phenomenal experience? Couldn’t be the case that conscious
experience is the hallmark of a certain style of information processing? Will
conscious machines be able to outperform as to autonomy, semantic understanding,
dealing with unexpected events, showing personal identity, achieving
satisfactory human-machine communication?
Riccardo Manzotti. Riccardo Manzotti (PhD in Robotics, Professor of Psychology at IULM University, Milan) and currently Fulbright Visiting Scholar at MIT, has been working for the best part of the last ten years on the topic of machine consciousness. He is coeditor of the “International Journal on Machine Consciousness”, He has written several papers on artificial consciousness as well as on consciousness and has co-organized or be an active presenter in several international workshop on machine consciousness and related topics (International Workshop on Artificial Consciousness 2005, Nokia Workshop on Machine Consciousness 2008, BICS 2010. Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems Conference, BICA. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2009, Machine Consciousness 2011: Self, Integration and Explanation, BICA 2012).
Manzotti's website: http://www.consciousness.it
Antonio Chella from 2001 has been a full professor in Robotics at the University of Palermo. He is the head of the Robotics Laboratory of DICGIM-University of Palermo and a former Director of the Department of Computer Engineering at the University of Palermo. He published more than 200 papers on machine consciousness, cognitive systems, robotics and neural networks. He is a referee of international scientific journals and he has been a member of the program committee of several international conferences. He is the founder and editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Machine Consciousness and an associate editor of Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures (BICA) journal. He is a co-founder and current member of the board of the BICA Society. He edited, together with Riccardo Manzotti, the book "Artificial Consciousness", by Imprint Academic, UK, which is a main reference in the field. Detailed information on the scientific activity, including links to publications, can be found at Antonio Chella’s website: http://www.antoniochella.it/Antonio/Home.html
Adami, C. (2006). What Do Robots Dream Of ? Science, 314, 1093–1094.
Aleksander, I. (2008). Machine consciousness. Scholarpedia, 3(2), 4162.
Aleksander, I., Awret, U., Bringsjord, S., Chrisley, R., Clowes, R., Parthermore, J., Stuart, S., et al. (2008). Assessing Artificial Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(7), 95–110.
Baars, B. J. (1997). In The Theatre of Consciousness, 4(4), 292–309.
Buttazzo, G. (2000). Can a machine ever become self-aware? In R. Aurich, W. Jacobsen, & G. Jatho (Eds.), (p. 49). Los Angeles: Goethe Institute.
Buttazzo, G., & Manzotti, R. (2008). Artificial consciousness: Theoretical and practical issues. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 44, 79–82.
Chella, A., & Manzotti, R. (2009a). Artificial Consciousness. Thorverton.
Chella, A., & Manzotti, R. (2009b). Machine Consciousness: A Manifesto for Robotics. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 1(1), 33–51.
Chella, A., & Manzotti, R. (2012). AGI and Machine Consciousness. Theoretical Foundations of Artificial General Intelligence, 4, 263–282.
Clowes, R., Torrance, S., & Chrisley, R. (2007). Machine Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(7), 7–14.
Gamez, D. (2010). Information integration based predictions about the conscious states of a spiking neural network. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 294–310.
Holland, O. (2003). Machine consciousness. New York: Imprint Academic.
Holland, O. (2004). The Future of Embodied Artificial Intelligence: Machine Consciousness? In F. Iida (Ed.), (pp. 37–53). Berlin: Springer.
Jennings, C. (2000). In Search of Consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 1.
Koch, C. (2004). The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach. Englewood (Col): Roberts & Company Publishers.
Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2008). Can Machines Be Conscious? IEEE Spectrum, 45(6), 47–51. doi:10.2307/539906
Manzotti, R. (2006a). A Process Oriented View of Conscious Perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(6), 7–41.
Manzotti, R. (2006b). Consciousness and existence as a process. Mind and Matter, 4(1), 7–43.
Manzotti, R. (2008). A Process-Oriented View of Qualia. In E. Wright (Ed.), The Case for Qualia (pp. 175–190). Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
Manzotti, R. (2011a). Machine Free Will: Is Free Will a Necessary Ingredient of Machine Consciousness? In C. Hernandez, R. Sanz, J. Gomez-Ramirez, L. S. Smith, A. Hussain, A. Chella, & I. Aleksander (Eds.), From Brains to Systems (pp. 81–89). Dordrecht: Springer.
Manzotti, R. (2011b). The Spread Mind. Seven Steps to Situated Consciousness. Journal of Cosmology, 14, 4526–4541.
Manzotti, R. (2011c). The Spread Mind. Is Consciousness Situated? Teorema, 30(2), 55–78.
Manzotti, R. (2012). The Computational Stance Is Unfit for Consciousness. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 4(2), 401–420.
Manzotti, R., & Tagliasco, V. (2005). From behaviour-based robots to motivation-based robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 51, 175–190.
Manzotti, R., & Tagliasco, V. (2008). Artificial consciousness: A discipline between technological and theoretical obstacles. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 44(2), 105–117.
Mccarthy, J. (1995). Making Robots Conscious of their Mental States. In S. Muggleton (Ed.), Machine Intelligence (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. (2011). Neuroscience. Feedback from frontal cortex may be a signature of consciousness. Science, 332(6031), 779.
Molyneux, B. (2012). How the Problem of Consciousness Could Emerge in Robots. Minds and Machines. doi:10.1007/s11023-012-9285-z
Noë, A., & Thompson, E. (2004). Are there Neural Correlates of Consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(1), 3–28.
O’Regan, K. J. (2012). How to Build a Robot that is Conscious and Feels. Minds and Machines, 22(2), 117–136.
Overgaard, M., & Grunbaum, T. (2012). Cognitive and non-cognitive conceptions of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 137.
Overgaard, R., & Overgaard, M. (2010). Neural Correlates of Contents and Levels of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 1.
Seth, A. K. (2009). The Strength of Weak Artificial Consciousness. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 1(1), 71–82.
Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: relating behavioural out neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 314–321.
Shanahan, M. P. (2010). Embodiment and the Inner Life. Cognition and Consciousness in the Space of Possible Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. G. (2007). CODAM: A neural network model of consciousness. Neural Networks, 20, 983–992.
Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. The Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216–42.